Home Online Banking F&M Website Commodity Futures Weather Market News DTN Ag Headlines Futures Markets Portfolio
- DTN Headline News
JBS Reaches Pork Settlement in Court
By Todd Neeley
Wednesday, January 20, 2021 2:14PM CST

OMAHA (DTN) -- JBS has reached a settlement in an ongoing class-action lawsuit that alleges JBS, along with several other large meat companies, conspired to raise the price of pork.

According to the settlement preliminarily approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota last week, JBS will pay $24 million in monetary relief and agrees to cooperate with the direct purchaser plaintiffs in the case against other pork companies.

Other defendants in the case include Agri Stats Inc., Clemens Food Group LLC, Hormel Foods Corp., Indiana Packers Corp., JBS USA, Seaboard Foods LLC, Smithfield Foods Inc., Triumph Foods LLC, and Tyson Foods Inc.

In 2018, several plaintiffs alleged in a complaint that the companies entered into a conspiracy from "at least 2009 to the present to fix, raise, maintain and stabilize the price of pork. The principal (but not exclusive) method by which defendants implemented and executed their conspiracy was by coordinating their output and limiting production with the intent and expected result of increasing pork prices in the United States."

The settlement class covers anyone who bought pork directly from JBS or other defendants in the lawsuit, starting on Jan. 1, 2009, and continuing to the date of the settlement.

According to the complaint filed in 2018, the plaintiffs alleged a conspiracy among the defendants.

"To effectuate and ensure the stability of their price-fixing agreement, defendants relied on a unique industry data-sharing service known as Agri Stats," the complaint said.

"Agri Stats provided a means for defendants to obtain and monitor critical and competitively sensitive business information regarding each other's production metrics, thereby serving as a central and critical part of defendants' price-fixing scheme, resulting in a remarkably stable and successful anticompetitive cartel."

The plaintiffs pointed to increased concentration in the pork industry as "an ideal zone for collusion."

"Because the industry was dominated by a relative handful of integrators, it was feasible to manipulate price through an agreement among the relatively few dominant players, whose market power greatly simplified the organizational complexity of the price-fixing agreement," the complaint said.

"Further, because none of the largest producers were capable of independently controlling price through their own production, such an agreement was necessary to inflate price."

The lawsuit alleges the industry began showing in 2009, "abnormal price movements. According to aggregate prices published by the USDA, the hog market year average price was at or below $50 every year between 1998 and 2009, before increasing to $76.30 in 2015."

In addition, the lawsuit said pork prices continued to rise into 2018.

"In 2009, 2010, and again in 2013, the pork industry cut production," the lawsuit said.

"The production dip in 2014 reflected the adverse impacts from the deadly pig disease, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus, which took place in the spring and summer of 2014. The decreases in production largely occurred after decreases in pork wholesale prices."

Todd Neeley can be reached at todd.neeley@dtn.com

Follow him on Twitter @toddneeleyDTN


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, January 22, 2021 11:24AM CST
Friday, January 15, 2021 12:19PM CST
Monday, January 11, 2021 11:04AM CST
Technically Speaking
Editorial Staff
Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:58AM CST
Monday, January 11, 2021 8:30AM CST
Monday, January 4, 2021 11:56AM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:44AM CST
Friday, January 15, 2021 8:28AM CST
Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:24AM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Thursday, January 21, 2021 7:31PM CST
Thursday, January 21, 2021 8:20AM CST
Wednesday, January 20, 2021 6:12AM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Katie Behlinger
Farm Business Editor
Thursday, January 14, 2021 3:36PM CST
Thursday, January 7, 2021 4:16PM CST
Monday, October 26, 2020 3:01PM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Friday, January 22, 2021 6:16PM CST
Tuesday, January 19, 2021 12:44PM CST
Friday, January 15, 2021 12:17PM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Friday, January 22, 2021 6:11PM CST
Monday, January 11, 2021 1:47PM CST
Thursday, December 31, 2020 7:40AM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Wednesday, January 13, 2021 5:10AM CST
Monday, January 11, 2021 4:39PM CST
Monday, January 4, 2021 4:33PM CST
South America Calling
Editorial Staff
Friday, January 22, 2021 3:09PM CST
Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:25PM CST
Friday, January 8, 2021 12:56PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Tuesday, January 19, 2021 5:14PM CST
Monday, January 11, 2021 11:32AM CST
Monday, January 4, 2021 9:43AM CST
Machinery Chatter
Dan Miller
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Friday, January 22, 2021 12:30PM CST
Friday, January 15, 2021 2:35PM CST
Tuesday, January 5, 2021 12:55PM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Friday, January 22, 2021 3:48PM CST
Thursday, January 21, 2021 4:11PM CST
Wednesday, January 20, 2021 3:28PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Thursday, December 31, 2020 8:57AM CST
Wednesday, December 2, 2020 12:37PM CST
Friday, September 4, 2020 3:48PM CST
 
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Farmers & Merchants State Bank as partnered with Telvent DTN, Inc. to bring you this DTN portal as a service to our customers. Farmers & Merchants does not control content provided by Telvent DTN, Inc. and makes no warranty as to the results that may be obtained from use of this site, or as to the accuracy or reliability of any information, service or merchandise provided through this site.
Powered By DTN